Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00212
Original file (PD2013 00212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   CASE: PD1300212
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130820
Date of SEPARATION: 20040308


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (11B/Infantry) medically separated for a left hip condition. The injury occurred in 2002 when the CI was struck from behind by a five ton truck and was crushed against the tailgate of another truck. He received surgery and physical therapy (PT), but could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Chronic left hip pain from acetabular fracture was forwarded to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The IPEB adjudicated left hip pain condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI appealed to the Formal PEB, but an IPEB reconsideration was conducted, which affirmed the IPEB finding and rating.


CI CONTENTION: “Because the prior DoD disability rating was not fair.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left hip pain is addressed below. Any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s assertion that the prior DOD was unfair and suggests a higher rating should have been granted on the unfitting medical condition documented at the time of separation. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB Reconsideration – Dated 20030912
 VA* - (~5.4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Hip Pain...
 5253 20% Residuals Left Acetabular Fx... 5253 10%** 20040818
Residual Scar, S/P ORIF Left Acetabular Fx 7804 10% 20040818
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 5 20040818
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 30%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20041015 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS) ) * * Rating adjusted to 3 0% in VARD dated 20060213 based on C&P 20040818 and Decision Review Officer De Novo review effective 20040309 or day after DOS

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Hip Pain Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 15 July 2003 noted the CI was injured when a five ton vehicle backed into him at low speed and pinned him against another vehicle. His injuries included a closed fracture of the left acetabulum and a soft tissue shear injury that was evacuated and treated with antibiotics, but did not involve muscle loss. He underwent open reduction and internal fixation for the fracture. The CI initially did well post-operatively, but his hip worsened over time. A CT scan of the pelvis was performed which showed a comminuted fracture in good anatomical position, felt to be healing. Despite treatment the CI continued with pain and required a cane for ambulation. At the MEB NARSUM examination 15 July 2003, approximately 8 months prior to separation, the CI reported worsening hip pain. The MEB exam noted left hip range-of-motion (ROM) of abduction of 10 degrees (normal 45); internal rotation of 0 (normal 40); external rotation of 20 (normal 60); and flexion of 85 (normal 125). There was tenderness to palpation (TTP) of the left groin and decreased sensation in the distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, otherwise motor and sensation were intact. It was noted that the CI was unable to weight bear without a cane and that he had a severe antalgic gait. Left hip X-ray dated 17 July 2003 showed surgical hardware in place, a healed acetabula fracture, and moderate left hip osteoarthritis. A MEB NARSUM a ddendum dated 4 November 2003 , approximately 4 months prior to separation, clarified the etiology of the CI’s hip dysfunction as moderate post-traumatic left hip arthritis with left hip pain and loss of motion , requiring the use of a cane for ambulation , and traumatic left femoral cutaneous nerve palsy. There was no mention of fracture malunion or poor healing . A second MEB NARSUM a ddendum dated 21 January 2004 , approximately 6 weeks prior to separation by the same physician , noted left hip ROM was flexion 30 degrees ; internal rotation 10; external rotation 10; abduction 10; adduction 10 degrees and a clear hip ‘malunion’. The examiner noted a cane was needed for ambulation secondary to pain. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) joints examination on 18 August 2004, approximately 5 months after separation, the CI reported left hip pain aggravated by standing and sitting. He reported numbness and paresthesias of the left anterior thigh. The CI reported flare-ups in bad weather, but no incapacitating episodes in the past year. The VA examiner noted the CI used a cane, had a marked limp on the left, and had significant difficulty getting on and off the examining table. On examination there was a well healed 13 centimeter scar in the left inguinal area without instability or irritation. There was ‘exquisite’ TTP of the inguinal area, lateral hip and buttock areas. Left hip ROM was flexion of 50 degrees (normal 125); extension of 10 (normal 30); external rotation of 0 (normal 60); internal rotation of 0 (normal 40). Motor function of the left hip was noted to be “at most, 1/5 with severe hip pain.” Quadriceps and hamstring muscles strength was 5/5. The examiner noted that the CI’s hip strength and ROM were decreased due to pain and it was not possible to determine DeLuca requirements because of pain with any attempts at repetitive motion testing. Left hip X-ray showed union of the acetabular fracture and the presence of well positioned surgical screws. The C&P general exam, approximately a week later, the examiner noted no complaints of numbness in the groin. There was ‘some’ TTP in the left inguinal area, normal sensation and strength and neurologic exam, and a well healed scar.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the left hip condition post-acetabula fracture at 20% coded as 5253 based on limited abduction. No higher rating is achievable under this code. The initial 15 October 2004 VARD rated the condition at 10%, also coded as 5253, based on limited adduction. The CI filed a Notice of Disagreement and a Decision Review Officer Decision (DROD) on 13 February 2006 noted the hip disability should have been coded analogously to femur impairment with marked hip disability and determined a revised disability rating of 30%. The Board deliberated the rating of the CI’s left hip condition. The Board agreed that the CI’s left hip decreased ROM, with abduction of 10 degrees, noted at the MEB exam, met the 20% rating of 5253. There was no higher rating achievable based on limited ROM. The Board considered if an additional rating was indicated for muscle injury IAW §4.56. There was no evidence in the record of muscle impairment due to trauma or surgery. The MEB exam noted normal left lower extremity motor examination. The C&P joints exam noted a hip strength of 1/5 due to pain; the C&P general examination a week later noted no muscle atrophy and a normal motor examination. The various examination findings suggest that the CI’s abnormal gait was due to pain from the hip, rather than muscle weakness or motor nerve injury. The Board concluded that additional rating of the left hip condition for muscle disability was not supported by the record. The Board next considered if an additional disability rating was justified for peripheral nerve impairment IAW §4.124a. The MEB exam noted TTP of the left groin and decreased sensation in the distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. The first MEB addendum listed traumatic left femoral cutaneous nerve palsy as a diagnosis contributing to the left hip dysfunction. At the C&P j oint exam the CI reported left anterior thigh numbness and paresthesias. On exam there was tenderness of the anterior, lateral and posterior left thigh and the examiner noted the CI’s paresthesias to have hyper-esthetic and “pins and needles” components. The Board opined that the CI’s lateral cutaneous nerve neuropathy was at most moderate and could be rated no higher than 0% code 8529 of no benefit to the CI. The Board noted the DR O D rated the hip condition 5255 ( f emur m alunion with marked hip disability ) at 30% stating : “ this (CI’s) disability is not specifically listed in the rating schedule; therefore, it is rated analogous to a disability (malunion) in which functions and symptoms are closely related. ” The Board then deliberated whether the use of an analogous code for malunion of the hip was indicated. The Board noted an orthopedic surgeon report found i n the MEB NARSUM a ddendum o n 21 January 2004 showed a “clear hip malunion” referring to a CT scan of March 2003, but notes this same surgeon initially determined no malunion from this same scan. The Board further noted the reports from this surgeon indicating no hip malunion on an X-ray performed on 17 July 2003 and in the MEB NARSUM addendum performed in 4 November 2003. The Board further noted the VA ’s X -ray of 18 August 2004, which showed a good union of the fracture sites or no malunion . Lastly, the Board noted the C&P general exam, also in August 2003, noted no complaints of numbness in the groin. There was “some” TTP in the left inguinal area, normal sensation and strength and neurologic exam. The Board unanimously agreed that the preponderance of evidence in the record did not support either the presence of hip malunion at the time of or after separation and or the application of code 5255. The Board was unable to find any additional appropriate VASRD coding for rating consideration. The Board therefore agreed that the CI’s left hip condition was best coded as 5253 and rated at 20%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability determination.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left hip pain condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication at separation. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.



RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Left Hip Pain
 5253 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130429, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130021809 (PD201300212)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01974

    Original file (PD2012 01974.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Left Hip Pain . However, a specialist did diagnose a soft tissue LBP condition 1 October 2002 as separate from the left hip pain The Board agreed that based on the evidence in the record both the left hip and LBP conditions were reasonably considered to be separately unfitting conditions at the time of separation. Chronic left hip pain condition: the VA rated the left hip pain condition as 8529 (neuropathy, external cutaneous nerve of the thigh) at 10%.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00011

    Original file (PD2013 00011.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions that met retention standards (urinary tract flow difficulties; paresthesias to both right thighs; and some vague minor discomfort in the abdominal wall when lying down) for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated “ shrapnel wound from an IED blast (10 A/C), penetrating the abdomen and causing a non-displaced fracture of the right acetabular dome, right hip joint” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00718

    Original file (PD2012 00718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The InformalPEB (IPEB) adjudicated the left hip pain as unfitting, rated 10%, with cited application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining (right) leg pain condition was determined to be CategoryII (conditions that contribute to the unfitting condition).The CI made no appeals and was medically separatedwith a 10% disability rating. Under any appropriate VASRD code, the disability evaluation would result in a 10% rating as granted by the PEB. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011 01093

    Original file (PD2011 01093.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An administratively corrected PEB adjudicated “ chronic bilateral hip pain with a history of acetabular fractures” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy, the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), and compensability under 10 USC § 1207a. Bilateral Hip Pain Condition . The decision review officer VARD in August 2004 determined the left hip condition was service-connected and rated the left hip...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00678

    Original file (PD2009-00678.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Antalgic gait; Neurostimulator in place§4.71a Rating10%20%20%20%The MEB exam on 18 October 2006, four months prior to separation, indicated the CI had an antalgic gait, positive SLR, and subjective numbness to the left groin. Although the VA exam did not document antalgic gait, it met the ROM criteria for a 20% evaluation and the Board could not reasonably consider different portions of different exams for a less favorable rating. In the matter of the GERD condition, or any other medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02128

    Original file (PD-2013-02128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On exam there was TTP of the neck with negative testing for nervecompression (Spurling’s), with normal ROM and normal bilateral UE examination.At the MEB examination on 21 October 2004, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic neck pain without radicular symptoms. The NARSUM notes the CI had a history of hip pain (trochanteric bursitis), with normal bilateral hip X-rays.Notes in the STR indicated that in April 2000 the CI reported 5 weeks of right hip pain. At the MEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02642

    Original file (PD-2013-02642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.TheInformal PEB adjudicated “pelvic ring fracture” and “left femur fracture,” conditions, rated at 10% and 10% respectively. It is noted, however, that the VA subsumed the acetabular fracture with the hip rating. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01056

    Original file (PD2011-01056.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded right hip pain secondary to femoral neck stress fracture and left sacroilitis condition on the DA Form 3947 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. An MRI done at that time noted no evidence of a left hip stress fracture. The CI was seen in follow up by Orthopedics for left hip pain in January 2009 with findings of a positive impingement test in the anterior and posterior left hip and it was noted that the more the CI walked, there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02319

    Original file (PD-2013-02319.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither the MEB nor the PEB documented the left hip, the left knee orthe lower back conditions for disability evaluation and therefore these contended conditions are not within the Board’s scope of review. However, the CI hip pain remained constant following surgery and she was not able to return to full duty.A permanent L3 profile was issued on 14 December 2004 for right hip fracture (right knee pain P2 injury) which precluded the CI from most military activities.At the MEB examination...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01638

    Original file (PD2012 01638.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic right hip painas unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separatedwith a10%disability rating. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...